TACTICAL LAW
  • Home
  • Professionals
    • Pamela K. Fulmer
    • Dee A. Ware
    • Marcela Davison Avilés
    • Affiliated Counsel
  • Practice
    • Software Audit Defense
    • Licensing & Contract Disputes
    • Litigation
    • ERP Licensing & Disputes >
      • Oracle/NetSuite Disputes >
        • River Supply v. Oracle/NetSuite
    • Advertising and Competition
    • Trade Secrets & Employee Mobility
    • Intellectual Property
    • Arts & Entertainment
    • Tech Transactions
    • Outside General Counsel Services
    • Privacy and Data Security
  • Industries
  • Resources
  • About us
  • Oracle Blog
  • Tactical Law Blog
  • Contact

Oracle Blog

ITAM survey uncovers more damning evidence of Oracle's predatory audit practices designed to drive Oracle cloud sales.

1/31/2020

1 Comment

 
By Pamela K. Fulmer

​The ITAM Review recently published the results of its December 2019 survey of Oracle customers, asking for their first-hand experiences and whether Oracle employed predatory software audit practices to coerce Oracle customers to buy Oracle cloud products.  According to the ITAM Review “the information gathered validates the case against Oracle suggesting they used improper tactics to falsify the success of their cloud products”.  ITAM asked its readers whether (1) they had ever experienced Oracle using software audits to coerce customers into buying cloud products; and (2) whether Oracle ever offer discounts on on-premises software products in exchange for a cloud purchase that the customer did not need or want.  The answers given by Oracle audit customers are a resounding yes.  Here are the key take-aways from the customer survey:

• Anecdotes collected from ITAM Review readers “provide damning evidence of Oracle artificially inflating their cloud sales through dodgy deals and spurious audit tactics”.
•  Oracle routinely used software audits or the threat of audits to force Oracle customers to buy Oracle cloud.
•  Oracle customers rarely if ever used the cloud products they were forced to purchase.
•  Oracle used the threat of audits on ULA customers to attempt to force these customers to renew the ULA rather than certifying off.
• Customers believe Oracle Sales pushed cloud products because Oracle management financially incentivized them to do so.
•  Many customers buying Oracle cloud to avoid or resolve an audit never used the product and cancelled after one year.
•  ITAM concluded that “[i]nformation in our survey, from ITAM practitioners around the world, provides damning evidence to support Oracle artificially inflating cloud numbers to impress shareholders”.

Plaintiffs in the Sunrise Firefighters class action filed in the Northern District of California have until February 17, 2020 to file an amended Complaint.  It will be interesting to see whether Plaintiffs include in their amended pleading more specific anecdotes from Oracle customers like the ones detailed in the ITAM Review.  

Oracle customers who are under audit or under threat of audit should consider the following actions:

•  Resist Oracle’s demands to have endless meetings and conference calls and instead keep everything in writing.  You can better protect yourself from Oracle’s overreaches if you make Oracle commit to its positions in writing, and can use this record against them when negotiating your audit or other resolution.
•  Capitulating to Oracle’s threats may get you out of your audit sooner but may hurt you in the long run as Oracle may consider you an easy target for future forced sales and more software audits.  
•  Limit the information provided to Oracle to only what is contractually necessary and no more than that.  Providing voluminous information to Oracle that is not contractually required, will not get you out of the audit sooner but will only result in the demand for increased licensing fees from Oracle and a negative impact to your negotiating position.
•  Keep your IT staff under tight control and prohibit them from socializing and sharing information about your IT environment with Oracle Sales.  Less information is better and Oracle Sales will use these lunches and entertainment opportunities to extract information from your IT team, which will later be used against you.
•  Review your Oracle contracts carefully and ensure you have assignment rights before acquiring other companies, and assess your risk of non-compliance if you do not.  Oracle appears to monitor the business news relating to its customers and an acquisition often may trigger an audit.
•  Share any audit notice or inquiries from Oracle immediately with your in-house legal department and keep your in-house lawyers in the audit loop.  IT and procurement professionals should always involve their legal teams at the earliest opportunity.  
•  Whether you have in-house counsel or not, you should retain outside legal counsel experienced in Oracle’s software audits at the earliest opportunity to help guide your response strategy.

Tactical Law Group will continue to monitor the Sunrise Firefighters case. Please check back with this blog for periodic updates on that litigation.




1 Comment
Deep Red Nail Polish link
1/5/2024 07:13:15 pm

Interesting...

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    By Tactical Law Attorneys and From Time to Time Their Guests
    ​

    The contents of this blog is intended to convey general information.  It should not be relied upon as legal advice.  It is not an offer to represent you nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship.  Tactical Law does not sponsor, endorse, verify or warrant the accuracy of the information contained on internal sites or subsequent links.

    Best Lawyers Award Badge

    Authors

    Collectively we have practiced law in California for over 60 years.  Our attorneys have advised clients of all sizes across industries on how to favorably resolve software audits, licensing and other disputes with Oracle/NetSuite and other software companies.

    Archives

    December 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    June 2024
    April 2024
    February 2024
    December 2023
    September 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    December 2021
    July 2021
    May 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    August 2018
    July 2017
    January 2016

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

tactical law group llp

Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Contact

 COPYRIGHT TACTICAL LAW GROUP LLP 2016-2023..  ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
​ 
Legal Disclaimer:  Contents may contain attorney advertising under the laws of some states.  Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
  • Home
  • Professionals
    • Pamela K. Fulmer
    • Dee A. Ware
    • Marcela Davison Avilés
    • Affiliated Counsel
  • Practice
    • Software Audit Defense
    • Licensing & Contract Disputes
    • Litigation
    • ERP Licensing & Disputes >
      • Oracle/NetSuite Disputes >
        • River Supply v. Oracle/NetSuite
    • Advertising and Competition
    • Trade Secrets & Employee Mobility
    • Intellectual Property
    • Arts & Entertainment
    • Tech Transactions
    • Outside General Counsel Services
    • Privacy and Data Security
  • Industries
  • Resources
  • About us
  • Oracle Blog
  • Tactical Law Blog
  • Contact